Daniel Halan - 236 - Aug 30, 2014

Is it possible to apply custom serialization/deserialization of Classes with ServiceStack.Text, without using the [DataContract] attribute? either on Properties or complete objects (ToString/ParseJson)

Doug Schmidt:

Yep. https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack.Text#custom-serialization-routines

Daniel Halan:

Thanks, also guessing there is no alternative to Attribute-level name-changing (ie DataContract) ? as DataContracts are all or nothing, which is not convenient to use in a Base class