Fredrick Lackey - 297 - Mar 16, 2014

During serialization, will SS ignore properties having a private setter or missing a setter altogether?  Could’ve sworn I read this somewhere but I cannot seem to find it.

It doesn’t serialize without a public getter and doesn’t deserialize without a public setter.

Drazen Dotlic:

This has bitten me a few times, since we have automatic properties it’s all too easy to mistake public Whatever; as public Whatever { get; set; }… It’s a great feature though, with a minimum of ceremony you get desired behavior, just like the rest of ServiceStack.